Death Penalty Debate
« Stand at UN Leaves Many Angered »

Welcome Guest. Please Login or Register.
Nov 24, 2009, 12:10am



Death Penalty Debate



Death Penalty Debate :: Death Penalty News :: Death Penalty Asia :: Singapore :: Stand at UN Leaves Many Angered
   [Search This Thread][Send Topic To Friend] [Print]
 AuthorTopic: Stand at UN Leaves Many Angered (Read 180 times)
Anja
Tasmanian Devil
*******
member is offline

[avatar]

[yim] [aim]

Joined: Aug 2006
Gender: Female
Posts: 14,554
Location: Bamberg, Germany
Karma: 95
 Stand at UN Leaves Many Angered
« Thread Started on Dec 18, 2007, 2:40am »

Stand at UN Leaves Many Angered


Singapore's strong pro-death penalty stand during the November U.N.
General Assembly vote on a draft resolution calling for an end to the
death penalty has disappointed many and left Singaporeans asking why the
city-state is willing to risk international condemnation to pursue the
death penalty so publicly as a solution to crime.

"Why is Singapore so ham-fisted in wanting the death penalty when the
majority of nations are against it?" asked a senior Singaporean lawyer who
declined to be named because his legal business might be penalised.

"We should go with the trend in the world which is to abolish -- or at
least place a moratorium on -- state-sanctioned killing," he said by
telephone from Kuala Lumpur.

"If we can be the first one to commercially fly the Airbus 380, why are we
among the last in the world to defend and insist on carrying out state
killings?" he said. "After all we pride ourselves as world trend-setters."

Singapore was one of the few countries that fiercely opposed the
moratorium when the vote was taken on Nov 15 with 99 in favour, 52 against
and 33 abstentions.

The U.S. and China joined many developing countries, notably from the
Islamic world, in voting no after an acrimonious debate.

The full 192-member General Assembly is widely expected to endorse the
decision, possibly before Christmas, according to diplomats.

Opponents of the moratorium decried what they saw as an attempt by the
resolutions 87 co-sponsors to impose their values on the rest of the
world.

They argued that the death penalty was fundamentally a "criminal justice
issue" to be decided by national authorities. They saw the resolution as
blatant interference in the internal affairs of sovereign states.

Among the other vocal nations wanting the death penalty were Malaysia,
Egypt, and Barbados. The resolution calls for countries which still have
the death penalty to introduce a moratorium on executions, with a view to
abolishing capital punishment.

Singapore's U.N. envoy Vanu Menon saw the issue during debate as
cosponsors "trying to impose a particular set of beliefs on everyone
else".

Singapores strong stand on the death penalty, which is liberally employed
in the city-state for murder, drug trafficking and other offences,
provoked immediate anger from many long-time Singaporean anti-death
penalty activists.

Comments posted on Singaporean blogs and websites immediately afterwards
were highly critical describing Singapore, where the press is tightly
controlled and open debate rare, as a "busy little bee" defending the
death penalty.

"We are all upset that Singapore led the opposition -- but are not really
surprised," said Singaporean Sinapan Samydorai, who manages the Think
Centre, a Singaporean NGO that champions human rights and an end to
capital punishment.

"With over 400 executions since 1991, Singapore taking the lead in the
U.N. vote does not really come as a shock," he told IPS in a telephone
interview from Bangkok.

In all, 130 countries have banned the death penalty, and only 25 nations
carried out executions last year. "Singapore is a leader in the 25 nation
pack," Samydorai said.

Although U.N. General Assembly resolutions are not legally binding, a vote
calling for a suspension of the death penalty, backed by a majority of
countries, would be a significant statement of changing international
opinion.

On average, Singapore sentences between 10 to 20 people to death a year,
mostly for drug trafficking, Samydorai said, even though numerous studies
proved that the death sentence had little effect on drug trafficking.

"It remains an uphill task in Singapore to abolish the death sentence," he
said, adding there were several reasons influencing Singapore to defend
the use of the death penalty in its criminal justice system.

Being 76 % Chinese, Singapore was heavily influence by the traditional
Chinese view which held that harsh punishment deterred crime, restored
normalcy and maintained "Confucian peace and harmony".

"An inherited value system that sees hard, heavy punishment as a solution
is at the core of Singapores resistance to abolishing the death penalty or
even agreeing to a moratorium on executions," he said.

Singapore also saw the moratorium issue as impinging on its sovereign
right as a nation.

Perhaps another reason was that Singapore saw the death penalty as a
method of keeping itself "squeaky clean", free of crime, drugs and
"undesirable elements", he said.

"It is a kind of defensive barrier, an artificial wall to "protect"
Singapore," said Samydorai. "The tragedy is, it is inhuman and it does not
work."

Activists say Singapore as an international city surviving on world trade
and financial services should adopt more progressive policies than state
killings.

"It must recognise the right to life as contained in Article 3 of the
Universal Declaration of Human Rights and Article 6 of the International
Covenant on Civil and Political Rights which recognises the inherent right
of every person to life," Samydorai said.

"It cannot any longer justify a criminal justice system that uses the
death penalty based on retribution," he said.

(source: IPS News)


Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged

<<I hope that there no longer be recourse to capital punishment, given that states today have the means to efficaciously control crime, without definitively taking away an offender's possibility to redeem himself.>>
Pope John Paul II


<<Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former.>>
Albert Einstein
piggyletto
Suspect
*
member is offline





Joined: May 2008
Posts: 5
Karma: 0
 Re: Stand at UN Leaves Many Angered
« Reply #1 on May 12, 2008, 8:31am »

im singaporean and the death penalty makes ppl think twice about wad they want to do. in fact, becos of our harsh laws, outsiders c tis as sort of an opressive rule, but i feel tat it gives us a sense of security. look at US, there are so many murders but no 1 gives a shit, cos they will probably die on the death row. singapore is a country that means her words.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
adamc
Suspect
*
member is offline





Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
Karma: 0
 Re: Stand at UN Leaves Many Angered
« Reply #2 on Jun 15, 2008, 10:02pm »

Hello execution doesn't mean less people will commit murder, if your regime has its way it will execute political opponents too.
Link to Post - Back to Top  IP: Logged
   [Search This Thread][Send Topic To Friend] [Print]


<



free search engine website submission top optimization
Google
Webdeathpenalty3.proboards.com
Click Here To Make This Board Ad-Free


This Board Hosted For FREE By ProBoards
Get Your Own Free Message Boards & Free Forums!